现象艺术中心
放映时间：2012年12月24日 星期六 下午2点
地点：现象艺术中心
问路电话：18701387705
博客：http://blog.sina.com
影片资料：
大国无私房
No Country for Private Houses
片長(Length)：86分鐘
完成年份(Year)：2011 年07 月
導演(Director)：何里仁He Liren
攝影(Cinematography)：何里仁He Liren
剪輯(Editing)：何里仁He Liren
製作機構(Production Company)：传知行社会经济研究所The Transition Institute
對白(Dialog)：普通话 Chinses
字幕(Subtitle)：中文Chinses
故事梗概：
Synopsis：
强制拆迁，或许是中国特有的现象。以GDP为核心的经济发展模式，促使政府疯狂地出售土地以增加收入并拉动投资。而政府所出售的城市土地基本上都是公民拥有的合法私有财产。其中矛盾最为尖锐的是“经租房”的拆迁，“经租房”是1958年，城市私房主自主经营的房屋被政府统一管理，统一租赁，并把大部分房租归于政府。到文化大革命时，这些私房主遭到前所未有的迫害，除了房屋被红卫兵强行侵占之外，往往还要付出生命的代价。直至大规模的拆迁开始，大部分的私房主都未能收回自己的合法房产。其后的1982年《宪法》第十条，首次规定城市土地属于国家所有，这为政府在城市拆迁、出卖土地提供了极大的便利。因为这样的历史背景，在拆迁过程中，政府不承认私房主拥有 “经租”房屋的产权，尽管“经租房”并没有改变产权性质；同时政府也不承认房屋下面的土地使用权——而法律明确保障了公民这一最重要的财产权。
The forced relocation of residents may be a unique phenomenon to China. The economic development model developed by China is fixated on GDP growth, and as such the government sells land to increase its income and drive investment. Most of this land is the legally held private property of Chinese citizens. In this process, the most poignant contradiction is the removal of “The rent”. ”The rent began in 1958, and represented a form of residential property which offered home-owners an independent management right, but also gave the local government administration rights, as well as the right to lease the property. During the Cultural Revolution, these house-owners suffered persecution at the hands of the Red Guards. In addition to having their houses occupied by the Red Guards, many also lost their lives. Lasting until the beginning of the large-scale demolition, these house-owners couldn’t take back their legal private property. Thereafter, the tenth article in Constitution (1982) stated that urban land belongs to the State, which provided an enormous advantage to the government in the course of property confiscation and land sale. Owing to this historical background, the government didn’t concede the legal right of ownership the owners’ residential property when they operated the removal, although “The rent ” didn’t change the nature of the housing property. In addition, the government also didn’t grant the right to use the land underneath these houses, even though the law clearly protected the property rights of citizens.
導演簡歷：
Bio-filmography of Director：
何里仁，NGO从业者，服务于传知行社会经济研究所。传知行是致力于调查研究中国社会转型问题的民间智库。此片为本人第一部纪录片。
Liren HE works for The Transition Institute, an NGO and think tank that researches China’s most pressing social issues. This is He’s first film. At the end of 2007, He started to survey and collect information on China private real estate market. While shooting the film, He traveled to Beijing, Nanjing, Hangzhou and Changsha, and finished filming in the end of 2010. The final editing of the film was finished in July, 2011
導演闡述 ：
Director’s Statement:
任何现象都不会是孤立的存在。拆迁悲剧在中国普遍地上演，必然有其背后的制度渊源。当我们看到一幢幢民宅在哭天喊地的哀号中轰然倒地的时候，不免要思考，最重安居乐业的中国人，为什么连自己的家园都无法保护？思索这样的现实问题，必然把我们引向对过往的追溯，因为今天的一切皆是历史的造就。
基于此，本片将六十多年来中国私有房地产权的种种遭际一一展现，历史的事实表明，今天公民房产被普遍侵害的现象并非偶然。在政治权力凌驾于法律的情况下，公民的被侵害只是一种必然。而这种局面的延续，将会使更多的私有财产遭受侵害。或许，每个人的家园都可能被强拆。
No phenomenon can exist in isolation, and the tragedy that is forced relocation must of course have an institutional background. And after seeing so many houses collapse a the behest of our government, we have to ask ourselves how it is that we Chinese cannot even protect our own property. By thinking about these problems, we recognize that everything in today’s society has a historical cause.
Based on this, our film details the misfortune that has befallen private property in China over the past 60 years. This unfortunate history tells us that the forced eviction from legally held property is not an uncommon occurrence. Where political power is greater than the force of the law, it is inevitable that the rights of citizens will be encroached on. If this situation continues, private property will continue to face extinction in China, and perhaps someday, all of our homes will be threatened.
> 我来回应